Who has influence on media
Who has influence on the media
By Qaqamba Matundu
When it comes to who has the influence on the
media, journalists, and what stories to appear in the media in South Africa, it
has been reported that "The government has been able to keep media wrapped
around its finger since the beginning of media. This can lead to unfair
advantage in a political race between parties that are making campaigns that
are running the other reputation with, for all we know, false information. The
public has even been known to have a change in opinions after watching or
reading a source from the media. The government has learnt how to persuade
everyone, which is why our voices are more important than ever in our
generation. The government is taking control of the media making it harder for
individuals to form valid opinions without it being influenced."
(ukessays,2018)
Perceives report as ''In August 2017 came an
announcement that the former government spokesperson and so called "Gupta
crusader" Mzwanele Jimmy Manyi had bought ANN7, the 24-Hour news channel
broadcast on DSTV, and the pro-government newspaper owned by the Gupta family
Oakbay Investments, the sale to 100% Manyi owned Lodidox was financed by the
Guptas in a 450 million vendor financial deal (the New Age went for 150 million
an ANN7 for 300million). Former employees have said their work was regularly
edited to fit with the Gupta family agenda. Greg Nicholson wrote in his
analysis in the Daily Maverick. Meanwhile, the New Age has despite how
readership profited off the family's ties to government leaders earning
lucrative advertising subscription and event deals with the state. Manyi is
reported to have played a key role in the Bell Pottinger scandal and was an
outspoken critic of "white monopoly capital", a catchphrase of the
Pottinger propaganda campaign. Amongst other things he is also said to have
embarked on a Twitter crusade to discreate former finance minister Pravin
Gordan.
At the beginning of 2017, Sanef expressed its
unhappiness at chaos unfolding at the State of National Address (SONA)
preparations in February which saw the Economic Freedom Fighters ejected from
the Parliament. Sanef lamented what it called the growing securitization of
parliament. Journalists were prevented from reporting on the events by the
authorities, including having their freedom of movement restricted. Sanef said
in a statement that amongst other incidents, journalists based at parliament's
media offices were hapered from leaving and returning to their riot police.
Some photographers were also prevented from taking photographs.
The companies and businesspeople that have
influence on the media includes Tiso Blackstar Group, previously Times Media
Group that announced that it was shutting down the print edition of the Times,
the daily tabloid that was launched in 2007. Tiso managing director Andrew Gill
said declining circulation of the tabloid meant that it had become
unprofitable, despite an increase in its vendor prices, publishing a thinner
edition and cutting its circulation and reach. Instead, Tiso wants to focus on
an online premium product of the publication. Changing from print to fully
digital would necessitate changes in editorial processes and newsroom
structures. Gill stated in his letter. The retrenchment process was only
expected to be completed by the end of January 2018, and by the closure. Eight
staff have already been retrenched at Tiso over the past years.
The Independent Media group meanwhile launches
its own ombud office in May, following its withdrawal from the industry's press
council in 2016. Speaking at the launch of the office which was representative
in Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal, and the Western Cape executive chairman of the group
lqbal Surve, insisted that Independent Media was opposed to media appeals
tribunal as proposed by the ruling ANC government and its withdrawal from the
Press Council should not be seen as a lack of commitment to independent
regulations by the industry. The Independent Media withdrew from the press
Council because it wanted complaints to waive their rights to further legal
action, citing exorbitant legal costs. It has included a waiver clause in its
new press code
One of the examples where government is showing
influence in the media was when journalists were facing death threats character
assassination prevented from doing their work by the police, intimidated by
things, and chased away by the crowd. In at least one instance, the death of a
journalist has been blamed on a sustained and disturbing campaign of
intimidation.
While the harassment of journalists received
some attention in the context of the Gupta family and further revelations of
corruption and state capture threats on journalists in this country are coming
from all quarters and in different contexts. Journalists receive death threats,
are chased from scenes of unfolding news events, their events, their movement
restricted, are robbed and their characters assassinated. At least one death of
SABC journalist is being directly blamed on a campaign of intimidation and
harassment after she insisted on her right to report freely and without
censorship at the public broadcaster. Muthambi who was a communication minister
in an echo of a supreme court of appeal ruling in 2016, the minister was found
to be incompetent and to have interfered in the SABC boards' deliberation. The
parliamentary inquiry revealed that she had amongst other things undermined the
board in 2014 when she changed the SABC's article of incorporation, giving its
executive greater power. In further twist the inquiry found that this change
may not have proper legal standing following her failure to register it with
the companies and intellectual Property Commision (CIPC). " (Kruger and
Finlay,2017)
The
government indirectly controls what is put out into the media and is bribing
privately owned news stations to do the work for them. The government believes
that if they have privately owned stations take a bribe that they technically
doing anything wrong because the station chose to take the bribe meaning that they
believe in whatever cause they are about to put in their newspaper or radio
station. ''The private owner, in contrast has preference over advertising
revenue and contribution represented by the utility function where the first
term is advertising revenue and C is the subsidy from the government to the
private owner.
In
conclusion, the government has put more work into pretending not to have a significant
role in the media than doing anything to help locals. The government has taken
a source meant to help locals and turn it into a monstrosity of a power that
can influence a mass to do most anything. Our generation needs to stand up and
fight for our freedom that others have been fighting for generations. If this
continues at the pace that it is currently going at, we will have zero means of
selling false information from information making us powerless against the
government influence over the media.
Comments
Post a Comment